Field Exam in Changing Times: Fundamentals and Best Practices

October 7, 2022

By Jan Tammen


Jan Tammen of PNC Business Credit discusses some of the lasting changes to the field exam industry brought on by the pandemic.

It was the best of times; it was the worst of times. All in all, the COVID-19 pandemic was certainly one of the most stressful of times that many asset-based lending (ABL) professionals have experienced in their careers, especially in the field exam function. Rather suddenly, in a matter of a few days, the very fundamentals of the field exam job function changed. There was no more “field”, at least for the foreseeable future, and examiners lost many of the on-site capabilities that previously allowed them to be the vaunted “eyes and ears of the bank” for their institutions.

Test counts? Let’s hope there is cell phone reception in the warehouse.

Questions for the controller? Hopefully they are able to work remotely and have access to the data the team needs where they are.

Leading a team and/or training a new hire? Prepare to be even more intentional in setting up calls and monitoring progress.

The pandemic, and the messy quasi-emergence from it that the world currently finds itself in, challenged many of the notions of how due diligence could and should be performed, and posed significant challenges in technology, operation, and interaction. Once the dust settled, it also left field examiners with new approaches to how the work could be done, and age old, but ever-updated, fundamental best practices to perform it at their highest level.

Click here to read the full article.

It was the best of times; it was the worst of times. All in all, the COVID-19 pandemic was certainly one of the most stressful of times that many asset-based lending (ABL) professionals have experienced in their careers, especially in the field exam function. Rather suddenly, in a matter of a few days, the very fundamentals of the field exam job function changed. There was no more “field”, at least for the foreseeable future, and examiners lost many of the on-site capabilities that previously allowed them to be the vaunted “eyes and ears of the bank” for their institutions.

Test counts? Let’s hope there is cell phone reception in the warehouse.

Questions for the controller? Hopefully they are able to work remotely and have access to the data the team needs where they are.

Leading a team and/or training a new hire? Prepare to be even more intentional in setting up calls and monitoring progress.

The pandemic, and the messy quasi-emergence from it that the world currently finds itself in, challenged many of the notions of how due diligence could and should be performed, and posed significant challenges in technology, operation, and interaction. Once the dust settled, it also left field examiners with new approaches to how the work could be done, and age old, but ever-updated, fundamental best practices to perform it at their highest level.

Click here to read the full article.


About the Author

Tammen-Jan
Jan Tammen is the SVP – national recurring field exam manager for PNC Business Credit. In his current position, Tammen is responsible for managing and developing a team of 7 field exam managers and, indirectly, 50 field examiners working on regional and national field exams. His role includes examiner and manager development, and the coordination of high quality field examinations for PNC Business Credit ABL borrowers. He is also responsible for training manager for all field exam new hires across PNC Business Credit’s national footprint.

Tammen joined PNC Bank in 2011 as a senior field examiner in the Corporate Banking group, after working as an outsource field examiner. He then transitioned to Business Credit in 2014 and became a field exam manager in the Mid-Atlantic region in 2015, before transferring to Dallas in 2016 for his current role. He graduated from Elizabethtown College with a bachelor’s degree in international finance and marketing.